Multi-Level K-Way Circuit Partitioning via Middle-Levels Gray Code

---
count: false
class: nord-dark, middle, center

## 🧬 Multi-Level K-Way Circuit Partitioning via Middle-Levels Gray Code

@luk036 👨‍💻 · 2026 📅

---

### 📋 Agenda

**Part 1: Background** 🧠
- Middle-Levels Gray Code
- From Gray Code to Partitioning

**Part 2: Bug Fixes** 🐛
- Contraction Ratio Guard
- Half-Bits Formula Fix
- Memory Safety

**Part 3: K-Way Partitioning** 🔢
- Architecture
- MidLvlKWayPartMgr

]
.pull-right[

**Part 4: Multi-Level K-Way** 🏗️
- MLMidLvlKWayPartMgr
- Exhaustive Limits

**Part 5: Testing** 📊
- Benchmark Summary
- Test Suite

**Part 6: Design & Future** 💬
- Key Design Decisions
- Limitations & Future Work

]

---

## Abstract 📝

The **middle-levels Gray code** enumerates all balanced 2-way partitions, guaranteeing global optimality for small hypergraphs. This work extends it in four directions:

1. 🐛 **Bug fixes** — ibm01 stack overflow traced to pathological contraction ratios + wrong `half_bits` formula
2. 🛡️ **Memory safety** — `reserve()` and `emplace_back()` to prevent VLA→vector pointer invalidation
3. 🔢 **K-way partitioning** — pairwise exhaustive refinement on the full netlist with `bit_to_module` mapping
4. 🏗️ **Multi-level K-way** — contraction + FM legalization + exhaustive leaf for ≤ $25K/2$ modules

**68 tests pass** on Windows + macOS, covering IBM, p1, Yosys, and unit benchmarks.

---

## 🔄 Middle-Levels Gray Code

---

### 💡 The Core Idea

.mermaid[
<pre>
graph LR
    subgraph Ln["Weight n"]
        A["11000"] --- B["10100"]
    end
    subgraph Lnp1["Weight n+1"]
        C["11100"] --- D["11010"]
    end
    A --- C
    B --- D

style A fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1565c0,color:#2e3440,stroke-width:3px
    style C fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#2e7d32,color:#2e3440,stroke-width:3px
</pre>
]

For bitstrings of length $L = 2n+1$, visit all patterns with weight $n$ or $n+1$, flipping **exactly one bit** per step — identical to an FM move. Visits ${\color{blue} 2} \cdot \binom{2n+1}{n}$ states.

---

### 🔗 From Gray Code to Partitioning

| $N$ (modules) | $L$ (bits) | Dummy bits | States |
|--------------|------------|------------|--------|
| Odd: $2n+1$ | $L = N$ | 0 | ${\color{blue} \binom{N}{n}} + {\color{orange} \binom{N}{n+1}}$ |
| Even: $2n$ | $L = N+1$ | 1 | ${\color{blue} \binom{N+1}{n}} + {\color{orange} \binom{N+1}{n+1}}$ |

Each bit $i$ = partition of module $i$. Start from balanced initial vertex, traverse full Hamiltonian cycle, snapshot lowest-cost solution.

**Scalability**: n11 = 924 states (<1ms), n15 = 12,870 (<1ms), n20 = 705K (0.20s), n25 = 10.4M (3.4s).

---

## 🐛 Bug Hunt

---

### 💥 ibm01 Stack Overflow

ibm01.net (12,752 modules, 50K nets) crashed with stack overflow using multi-level contraction:

```
[lvl] modules=12752
[ctr] 12752 -> 7649  (60%)
[ctr] 7649 -> 4928   (64%)
...
[ctr] 675 -> 648     (96% — barely shrinks!)
CRASH — 14 levels deep, still 648 modules
```

The contraction ratio **degraded** from 60% to 4% as the graph shrank. FM-only (no contraction) worked fine at cost=564.

---

### Fix 1: Contraction Ratio Guard 🔒

Skip recursion when contraction is ineffective:

$$ \text{recurse only if: } {\color{blue} |\text{contracted}|} \cdot {\color{orange} 1.5} < {\color{green} |\text{original}|} $$

Applied in both `MLMidLvlPartMgr` and `MLPartMgr`. Capped ibm01 recursion from 14 to ~3 levels.

---

### Fix 2: Half-Bits Formula 🔧

| Formula | N=9 | N=11 | Correct? |
|---------|-----|------|----------|
| `(N+1)/2` (old, ceil) | 5 | 6 | ❌ adds 2 dummy bits |
| `N/2` (fixed, floor) | 4 | 5 | ✅ correct |

Old formula added **2 extra dummy bits** for every odd $N$, inflating search space. n25 speedup: 12.9s → 3.4s (3.8×).

---

### Fix 3: Memory Safety 🛡️

Original C code used VLAs (`int x[2*n]`) — stack-allocated, never reallocate. MSVC adaptation replaced with `std::vector`:

| File | Fix | Prevents |
|------|-----|----------|
| `hamcycle.cpp` | `y_vec.reserve(size+1)` | Realloc on dummy-bit push |
| `hamcycle.cpp` | `seq01.reserve(1)` | Single-element realloc |
| `vertex.cpp` | `push_back()` → `emplace_back()` | Temporary construction |

---

## 🔢 K-Way via Pairwise Exhaustive

---

### 🏗️ Architecture

.mermaid[
<pre>
flowchart LR
    A["K-way Partition"] --> B["Pair (i,j)"]
    B --> C["Select modules\nin parts i∪j"]
    C --> D["MidLvlPartMgr\n(full netlist + mask)"]
    D --> E["Update assignments"]
    E --> F{"More pairs?"}
    F -->|Yes| B
    F -->|No| G["Done"]

style A fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#2e7d32,color:#2e3440,stroke-width:3px
    style D fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1565c0,color:#2e3440,stroke-width:3px
    style G fill:#ffcdd2,stroke:#c62828,color:#2e3440,stroke-width:3px
</pre>
]

Key insight: operate on the **full netlist**, not a sub-netlist. The HamCycle uses a `selected[pos] → module_index` mapping to track which modules are being optimized.

---

### 🧩 MidLvlKWayPartMgr Class

```cpp
class MidLvlKWayPartMgr {
    void optimize(part, hyprgraph) {
        for (pass < max_passes) {
            for (pair (i, j) of K parts) {
                selected = modules where part[v] == i or j;
                if (selected.size() <= 1 || selected.size() > 15) continue;
                // bit_to_module: HamCycle bit pos → module index
                init_bits = [half=1, half=0]; // balanced start
                // visitor: use cnt_from/i, cnt_to/j, cnt_other/fixed
                MidHamCycle(start_vertex, -1, visit_fn);
                apply best partition found;
            }
        }
    }
};
```

---

## 🏗️ Multi-Level Integration

---

### 🏗️ MLMidLvlKWayPartMgr

.mermaid[
<pre>
flowchart LR
    A["Input Netlist"] --> B{"≤ exhaustive_limit?"}
    B -->|Yes| C["MidLvlKWayPartMgr\n(pairwise exhaustive)"]
    B -->|No| D["FM K-Way Legalize"]
    D --> E{"≥ limitsize?"}
    E -->|Yes| F["Contract Graph"]
    F --> G["Recurse"]
    G --> H["Project Up"]
    H --> I["FM K-Way Optimize"]
    E -->|No| I
    I --> J["Output Partition"]

style A fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1565c0,color:#2e3440,stroke-width:3px
    style C fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#2e7d32,color:#2e3440,stroke-width:3px
    style J fill:#ffcdd2,stroke:#c62828,color:#2e3440,stroke-width:3px
</pre>
]

Same multi-level pattern as `MLPartMgr`. At leaf: exhaustive pairwise refinement. Exhaustive limit: ${\color{blue} 25}$ (2-way), ${\color{orange} 25K/2}$ (K-way).

---

### 🔢 Exhaustive Limits by Partition Count

| K | exhaustive_limit | Pairs | Max pair size |
|---|-----------------|-------|---------------|
| 2 | 25 | $(2,1)=1$ | 15 |
| 3 | $25·3/2 = 37$ | $(3,2)=3$ | 15 |
| 4 | $25·4/2 = 50$ | $(4,2)=6$ | 15 |
| 5 | $25·5/2 = 62$ | $(5,2)=10$ | 15 |
| 6 | $25·6/2 = 75$ | $(6,2)=15$ | 15 |

Even at K=6 with 75 modules, each pair only sees ~25 modules on average; pairs with >15 modules are skipped.

---

## 🧪 Results

---

### 📊 Benchmark Summary

| Benchmark | K | Modules | Time | Cost |
|-----------|---|---------|------|------|
| p1 (limitsize=10) | 2 | 833 | 19ms | 58 |
| p1 (limitsize=20) | 2 | 833 | 19ms | 58 |
| p1 3-way | 3 | 833 | 91ms | 114 |
| sphere 2-way | 2 | 65 | 3ms | 9 |
| ibm01 (limitsize=50) | 2 | 12,752 | 397ms | 786 |
| n20 exhaustive | 2 | 20 | 0.20s | 1 |
| n25 exhaustive | 2 | 25 | 3.4s | 1 |

---

### ✅ Test Suite

```
65 test cases | 285 assertions | 0 failures | 0 skipped
```

.font-sm[
| Category | Count |
|----------|-------|
| MidLvlPartMgr (exhaustive) | 7 |
| MLMidLvlPartMgr (multi-level 2-way) | 8 |
| MidLvlKWayPartMgr (pairwise K-way) | 1 |
| MLMidLvlKWayPartMgr (multi-level K-way) | 2 |
| FM bi-partition | 5 |
| FM K-way | 3 |
| MLPartMgr + MLNNPartMgr | 25 |
| Yosys JSON | 5 |
| Other | 9 |
]

---

## 📊 Design & Discussion

---

### 🎯 Key Design Decisions

.font-sm[
| Decision | Rationale |
|----------|----------|
| Leaf check **before** legalization | Exhaustive visits all balanced partitions |
| Return `GetBetter` at leaf | Honest: can't confirm FM balance constraints |
| Contraction guard ≤ 2/3 | Prevents 14-level ibm01 recursion |
| `max_pair_modules = 15` | ~12,870 states, instant |
| Full netlist (no sub-graph) | Correct K-way cost: `cnt_other` counts all fixed pins |
| `bit_to_module` mapping | HamCycle bit position → module index |
| `exhaustive_limit = 25` (2-way) | ≤ 10M states, ~3s |
| `exhaustive_limit = 25·K/2` (K-way) | Scales with partition count |
]

---

### 📁 File Structure

| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `MidLvlPartMgr` | Exhaustive 2-way (HamCycle + visitor) |
| `MLMidLvlPartMgr` | Multi-level 2-way (contract → exhaustive leaf) |
| `MidLvlKWayPartMgr` | K-way pairwise (full netlist + `cnt_other`) |
| `MLMidLvlKWayPartMgr` | Multi-level K-way (contract → exhaustive K-way leaf) |
| `hamcycle/vertex/tree` | Muetze-Nummenpalo algorithm (MSVC-adapted) |

---

### Limitations & Future Work 🚧

- **Exponential**: only feasible for ≤ 25 modules (2-way) or ≤ 75 modules (K-way, distributed across pairs)
- **Netlist scan per flip**: Each flip scans all nets of moved module; FMKWayGainCalc could pre-compute gains
- **ibm contraction**: Contraction degrades quality on ibm01 (564→786); per-benchmark limitsize tuning needed
- **Balance tolerance**: Exhaustive assumes exactly balanced (weight $n$ or $n+1$)
- **K-way convergence**: 5 passes may not be enough for all cases; could add convergence check

---

# 🙋 Q&A

### Questions? Discussion? 💬

---

# 👏 Thank You

@luk036 · github.com/luk036/ckpttn-cpp

Slides built with Remark.js 🎉 | KaTeX 📐 | Mermaid 🧩 | Nord Theme 🌙